Expert Judgment Instructions for Smarter Decision-Making
by: Meredith G. Malinawan, PMP; Editor: Geram Lompon; Reviewed by: Alvin Villanueva, PMP
Ever wonder why similar projects can have wildly different outcomes? In 2016, an international airport expansion ran $500 million over budget and was delayed by two years, all because decision-makers relied too heavily on a single, overly optimistic expert. Meanwhile, another company avoided a major product recall by listening to various voices: risk managers, engineers, and compliance officers who flagged safety issues before they became expensive mistakes.
This difference boils down to one thing: the structured, strategic use of expert judgment. Far from simple guesswork, efficient expert judgment means tapping into diverse, specialized insights to make informed, risk-aware decisions.
In this guide, we will show you how to elicit, assess, and integrate expert judgment so that you can navigate your projects more successfully, sidestep pitfalls, and build greater confidence in your decision-making process. Let us get started.
What Makes Expert Judgment Impactful in Project Management ?
Expert judgment isn’t just an opinion—it’s a critical decision-making tool rooted in deep knowledge, hands-on experience, and sharp insights. Expert input from your team, outside consultants, or seasoned industry pros adds context that raw data can’t provide. It helps you see the bigger picture, weigh risks, and make smarter choices at every stage of your project—all while staying aligned with your goals.
Key benefits of using expert judgment include:
- Enhanced Decision-Making: Provides the context and nuance necessary for well-rounded choices.
- Risk Reduction: Identifies and mitigates potential issues before they can escalate.
- Improved Project Planning: Leads to more accurate forecasts for costs, timelines, and resource needs.
- Strategic Alignment: Ensures project decisions align with organizational priorities and industry standards.
- Knowledge Transfer: Converts experiential insights into structured processes for long-term efficiency.
Apply expert judgment with intention and structure. Without a clear approach, bias or overconfidence can cloud even the sharpest insights.
Practical Applications in a Project Lifecycle
Expert judgment is a crucial guide at every stage of a project:
- Initiation: Experts evaluate feasibility, define project scope, and set clear objectives.
- Planning: They craft detailed plans, including risk management and resource allocation strategies, while keeping stakeholders engaged.
- Execution: Expert insights are key during project work for problem-solving, quality control, and adjusting to evolving conditions.
- Monitoring & Control: Experts track progress against plans and recommend timely corrective actions.
- Closing: They assess outcomes, capture lessons learned, and ensure deliverables meet stakeholder expectations.
How Expert Judgment Boosts Project Outcomes
Using expert judgment turns decision-making into a strategic advantage:
- Better Decisions: It enables informed, strategic choices directly impacting project success.
- Risk Reduction: Accurate risk assessments help prevent delays and cost overruns.
- Increased Trust: Decisions grounded in expert insights build stakeholder confidence and satisfaction.
Expert judgment is indispensable in today’s fast-paced, complex project environments. Project managers who collaborate with specialists confidently navigate uncertainties and complete projects on time, within budget, and to high-quality standards.
How to Elicit Expert Judgment: 8 Steps to Smarter Decision-Making
Gathering expert judgment is an art and a process. It combines the unique insights of seasoned experts with a structured approach to transform their wisdom into actionable project strategies. To capture high-quality input while minimizing bias, follow these eight practical steps designed to boost decision-making accuracy:
- Define the Quest: Explain what you need from the expert judgment process for insight synthesis.
- Curate Your Wisdom Circle: Select a diverse group of experts that brings together varied and relevant expertise.
- Set the Stage: Prepare the environment and tools needed for the elicitation sessions, focusing on session structuring to facilitate smooth and efficient discussions.
- Capture Initial Insights: Gather initial thoughts and opinions from experts independently to avoid group bias and influence.
- Convene the Expert Council: Bring all experts together to discuss their insights and challenge each other’s views in a structured setting.
- Refine and Harmonize: Synthesize the collective input from the council to form a cohesive understanding and refined output.
- Document the Wisdom: Carefully record the outcomes of the expert deliberations, ensuring all critical insights are captured and documented.
- Validate and Verify: Check the accuracy and applicability of the expert judgment against project needs and external benchmarks.
Let us dive deeper into each step.
Define the Quest – Clarify Your Judgment Needs
Clearly outline your project’s objective and the expert input you need. Avoid ambiguity by documenting the judgment scope, purpose, and context. Ensure that experts consider key parameters—such as timelines, budgets, risks, and resource constraints—by providing a simple, structured template that defines the expected format and level of detail in their insights.
Curate Your Wisdom Circle – Gather the Right Experts
Select a diverse panel of experts—internal professionals, external consultants, subject matter experts, and risk specialists—to offer well-rounded insights. Establish clear selection criteria focused on expertise, credibility, and relevant experience. Document their backgrounds and credentials, noting potential conflicts to ensure balanced, unbiased input.
Set the Stage – Prepare for Meaningful Insights
Prepare your experts by sharing concise project documentation and context summaries ahead of time. Hold orientation sessions to align expectations and familiarize them with elicitation techniques like the Delphi method, structured interviews, and scenario analysis (more details in the next section).
Capture Initial Insights – Extract Unbiased Expertise
Begin by collecting individual insights from each expert to avoid groupthink and ensure each perspective stays authentic. Use structured questionnaires or data-driven prompts to guide experts in outlining their assumptions, reasoning, and references. Keep responses anonymous when possible, especially with the Delphi method, to minimize bias and peer influence.
Convene the Expert Council – Foster Strategic Discussions
Bring experts together for a structured discussion where they can freely compare views, challenge assumptions, and uncover blind spots. Use a neutral facilitator to ensure balanced participation and foster an open, respectful debate environment. Document all key points, noting areas of agreement, disagreement, and critical decisions.
Refine and Harmonize – Achieve Consensus & Accuracy
Allow experts to refine their initial judgments using the insights gathered from group discussions. Provide each expert with a concise discussion summary and encourage revisions that enhance logical consistency. Define clear convergence criteria so everyone knows when the group has reached a solid, decision-ready consensus.
Document the Wisdom – Preserve Expert Insights for Action
Consolidate and document the refined expert judgments to create a clear record that supports transparent decision-making. Organize responses in a structured format, highlighting consensus areas and any remaining uncertainties. Include all underlying assumptions, rationale, and supporting evidence, then store everything securely in a centralized
Validate and Verify – Ensure Accuracy & Practicality
Ensure your expert judgments are robust and aligned with your project’s realities. Cross-check their insights with historical data, benchmarks, and predictive models. When possible, involve independent specialists for peer reviews and confirm that the inputs are practical and reliable before using them in your decisions.
Choosing the Right Method to Elicit Expert Judgment
Eliciting expert judgment is key to accurate decision-making. Choose a technique suited to your project’s complexity, objectives, and constraints to ensure reliable, bias-reduced insights. Below are the most effective methods for gathering expert opinions:
| Method | Best Used For | Key Benefit |
| Delphi Technique | Achieving consensus on complex issues | Reduces bias and refines expert input |
| Expert Elicitation | Structured expert input for risk assessment | Captures deep insights systematically |
| Brainstorming | Generating creative solutions quickly | Encourages free-thinking and innovation |
| Analogy & Case-Based | Learning from past projects | Provides practical, experience-based guidance |
| Expert Panels | Exploring diverse expert viewpoints | Enables collaborative discussions |
| Nominal Group Technique | Prioritizing multiple expert judgments | Ensures fair ranking of ideas |
Tailor your approach and gather diverse perspectives to enhance the quality and effectiveness of your decisions.
The Role of Experts – Who to Trust in Your Projects?
Experts’ specialized knowledge is pivotal in guiding project decisions, managing risks, and ensuring success. They bridge the gap between theoretical planning and real-world execution, offering the practical wisdom to make informed choices. By drawing on the insights of industry specialists, technical consultants, subject matter experts, and seasoned project managers, you can significantly enhance project efficiency, accuracy, and strategic alignment.
Types of Experts and Their Contributions
- Industry Specialists
- Offer deep insights in different sectors such as construction, healthcare, IT, finance, and manufacturing.
- Ensure projects follow industry standards and regulations.
- Share knowledge on market trends, competitor benchmarks, and sector-specific risks.
- Technical Consultants
- Provide expertise in fields like engineering, software development, and cybersecurity.
- Assess the technical feasibility of plans and recommend innovative solutions.
- Ensure that technical components meet performance and security requirements.
- Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
- Deliver in-depth knowledge in specialized areas such as marketing, supply chain management, or human resources.
- Provide valuable insights on best practices, compliance, and optimization strategies.
- Help align project deliverables with industry benchmarks and client expectations.
- Experienced Project Managers
- Bring practical wisdom from a proven track record of successful project delivery.
- Align project execution with strategic goals while managing risks.
- Leverage past experiences to streamline the planning process and avoid common pitfalls.
Integrating Expert Judgment into Every Decision
Competent expert judgment is more than just collecting opinions—it is about applying these insights to drive better decisions. Experts contribute to:
- Risk Assessment & Mitigation: Identifying potential issues, analyzing their impact, and recommending preemptive solutions.
- Resource Planning & Budgeting: Ensuring that projects are feasible and cost-effective.
- Quality Control & Compliance: Validating deliverables meets all necessary standards and regulatory requirements.
- Innovation & Problem-Solving: Creating creative solutions to unforeseen challenges.
By strategically integrating diverse expert insights into your decision-making process, you can optimize resources, manage risks more effectively, and steer your projects toward success.
Avoiding Bias and Overconfidence in Expert Judgment
Expert judgment is invaluable in
Common Cognitive Biases Affecting Expert Judgment
Even the best experts can fall prey to cognitive traps that distort their judgment and jeopardize projects. Recognizing these biases is key to making sound decisions. Here are the most common ones:
- Anchoring Bias: Relying too heavily on initial estimates, even when new data emerges.
- Confirmation Bias: Focusing on information that supports existing beliefs while overlooking contradictory evidence.
- Overconfidence Bias: Underestimating risks and complexity, leading to overly optimistic plans.
Overconfidence Can Hurt: Understanding Its Risks
Overconfidence is a dangerous bias in expert judgment. It can lead to overly optimistic forecasts, neglect of contingency plans, underestimating complexity, and rejecting valuable feedback. In short, experts may assume best-case scenarios and ignore potential pitfalls.
Case Study: A Costly Miscalculation.
A project team underestimated the airport expansion’s budget by relying solely on a single expert’s optimistic cost estimate, which cost the project over $500 million and delayed its completion by two years. Diversity in expert judgment estimation could have highlighted the hidden geological challenges and averted this crisis.
Techniques to Recognize and Counteract Biases
Mitigating bias demands a structured, multi-pronged approach. Here is how to keep expert judgments distinct and objective:
- Structured Elicitation: Use methods like the Delphi Method to collect anonymous opinions over several rounds, preventing dominant voices from skewing results.
- Devil’s Advocate: Assign a project team member to challenge assumptions and test the robustness of expert views.
- Data-Driven Validation: Balance expert insights with objective data—historical trends, benchmarking, and predictive models—to ground decisions in facts.
- Pre-Mortem Analysis: Ask experts to envision a project failure and identify potential pitfalls before they occur.
- Diverse Perspectives & Training: Engage experts from various backgrounds and provide bias-awareness training to enhance overall judgment.
Strength in Diversity: How Varied Expert Insights Reduce Overconfidence
Consulting experts from different disciplines, industries, and experience levels can reduce overconfidence and gain a more balanced perspective. A balanced mix of experts can mitigate overconfidence by offering diverse perspectives:
- Industry Specialists: Ensure compliance with relevant standards and offer sector-specific insights.
- Technical Experts: Offer realistic assessments and innovative solutions from fields like engineering or IT.
- Financial Analysts: Validate financial projections to prevent cost underestimations.
- Risk Management Experts: Uncover potential risks that others might miss.
Case Study: Diverse Input Saves the Day.
An automotive company’s engineering team believed their battery performance estimates were sufficient for a new electric vehicle. However, a safety expert flagged overheating risks, prompting early design changes that prevented a disastrous product recall.
Bias, especially overconfidence, can jeopardize project outcomes. Embracing structured techniques, diverse expertise, and data-driven approaches helps organizations recognize and counter these biases and ensure more innovative, more balanced decision-making.
Maximizing Expert Judgment in Projects
Expert judgment can take advantage of technological advancements and structured best practices. Integrate these tools and strategies into your process to enhance and optimize expert judgment in your projects.
Leveraging Technology to Transform Expert Judgment
Emerging technologies are revolutionizing how expert judgment integrates into
- AI-Powered Expert Systems: Use predictive analytics to provide data-backed, real-time decision support.
- Machine Learning Algorithms: Identify patterns in past decisions, helping refine expert assessments and reduce errors.
- Blockchain Verification: Create secure, transparent records of expert credentials and contributions to build trust and credibility.
Best Practices for Effective Expert Judgment Integration
To make the most of expert input, implement these best practices:
- Clearly Define Objectives: Set clear goals for where and how expert judgment will be applied, whether on risk assessment or resource estimation.
- Assemble Diverse Panels: A mix of backgrounds and specializations ensures balanced perspectives.
- Use Structured Methods: Techniques like the Delphi Method or Nominal Group Technique encourage unbiased, consensus-driven results.
- Mitigate Bias: Train teams on cognitive biases, assign a Devil’s Advocate, and apply premortem analysis to uncover hidden risks.
- Balance Insights with Data: Combine skilled opinion with empirical data, such as historical trends or simulations for improved reliability.
- Document and Validate Inputs: Maintain transparent records of judgments and assumptions, with blockchain adding a layer of verification.
- Continuously Update Assessments: Regularly reassess expert insights in evolving projects to keep decisions relevant.
To simplify and enhance your expert judgment process, you can use our comprehensive checklist as your practical guide:
[insert link to download the Expert Judgment Checklist]
This checklist offers structured guidance, ensuring effective and consistent execution of each step in eliciting and integrating expert judgment.
By embracing innovative technologies and structured techniques, project managers can overcome judgment challenges, enhance decision-making accuracy, and align expertise with data for more robust project outcomes.
Final Thought: How Will You Strengthen Your Expert Judgment Process?
The successful application of expert judgment is a competitive advantage. It drives smarter decisions, better estimates, and strategic alignment across your project’s lifecycle. Tapping into a broad range of expert insights—from industry specialists to technical consultants and experienced managers—can ease navigating complexities, manage risks, and reduce uncertainty.
As
To stay ahead, continuously refine your elicitation process. Ask yourself: Are you harnessing expert insights efficiently?
Wiser expert judgment leads to smarter decisions—start refining your process today!
References
Bourne, L. (2017). Understanding Expert Judgment. From the Voices on
Dickover, N. (2002). Leveraging expertise: lessons learned from integrating just-in-time learning and risk management assets to improve risk management performance across the DoD acquisition workforce. Paper presented at Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, San Antonio, TX. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/approach-address-risk-management-problems-4
Jarocki, T. L. (2014). One Solution for Project Success: Project and Change Management in the PMBOK® Guide. PMI White Paper. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/one-solution-for-project-success-11130
Kirytopoulos, K., Diamantas, V., & Leopoulos, V. (2007). Incorporating risks in schedule development. You have the tools, can you get the info? Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2007—EMEA, Budapest, Hungary. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/incorporating-risks-schedule-development-7383
Kumar, V. S. (2003). Requirements management for improved project performance. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2003—North America, Baltimore, MD. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/requirement-improved-project-performance-7678
Parth, F. R. (2013). Critical decision-making skills for project managers. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2013—EMEA, Istanbul, Turkey. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/critical-decision-making-skills-project-managers-5798
Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the
Project Management Institute. (2022). Process Groups: A Practice Guide. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute
Project Management Institute. (2016). Requirements Management: A Practice Guide. Newton Square, PA:
Project Management Institute. (2019). The Standard for Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects. Newton Square, PA:
Szwed, Paul. (2016). Expert Judgment in
Virine, L. (2009). Project risk analysis: how to make better choices in the uncertain times. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2009—North America, Orlando, FL. Newtown Square, PA:
Williams, T., Vo, H., Edkins, A., & Samset, K. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review: The Front End of Projects. PMI Sponsored Research. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/literature-review-front-end-projects-11994
Wootton, P. (2024.) Expert judgment. Techniques Wiki under Project Management.com. https://www.projectmanagement.com/wikis/344587/expert-judgment
