Project Pulse Journal
Publication Criteria
Criteria for Publication Decision
- Adherence to Submission Guidelines
- Criteria: Manuscript must follow the specified format, length, and style as outlined in the submission guidelines.
- Discretionary Element: The EIC can determine the extent to which deviations from guidelines are acceptable based on the uniqueness or value of the content.
- Relevance and Scope
- Criteria: The subject matter must align with the scope and thematic focus of Project Pulse.
- Discretionary Element: The EIC has the discretion to judge whether a manuscript offers a novel perspective or valuable insight into an area within the scope, even if it's a borderline case.
- Quality of Research
- Criteria: Research must be well-conducted, with clear objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions.
- Discretionary Element: The EIC can assess the potential impact or significance of the research in the field, even if not immediately apparent.
- Clarity and Coherence
- Criteria: The manuscript should be clearly written, logically structured, and free from significant language issues.
- Discretionary Element: Deciding the extent to which language and structural issues can be rectified through revisions while maintaining the integrity of the work.
- Ethical Compliance
- Criteria: Research must adhere to ethical standards, including proper approvals and consent where applicable.
- Discretionary Element: The EIC evaluates ethical considerations that may be subject to interpretation or are in a grey area.
- Originality and Contribution to the Field
- Criteria: The manuscript must offer original insights, data, or perspectives, and contribute meaningfully to its field.
- Discretionary Element: Assessing originality and contribution can inherently involve subjective judgment based on the EIC’s expertise and understanding of the field.
- Adherence to Field-Specific Standards
- Criteria: Compliance with the accepted standards and practices of the relevant academic or research field.
- Discretionary Element: The EIC’s interpretation of these standards can vary, especially in rapidly evolving fields.
Additional Guidelines for Editorial Discretion
- Documented Justifications: For any discretionary decision, especially rejections, the EIC shall provide a documented rationale, ideally referencing specific aspects of the criteria.
- Consistency in Decision-Making: Consistency in applying criteria and discretionary judgments shall be conducted to the maximum extent possible to avoid biases.
- Appeal Process Guideline: ROSEMET maintains a fair and transparent appeal process, allowing authors to contest publication decisions by submitting a detailed appeal within 30 days of the decision, ensuring their concerns are objectively reviewed and addressed by a dedicated appeal panel. This process provides a clear avenue for authors to challenge decisions, seeking clarification or reconsideration based on substantive issues related to their manuscript. Click here for additional information.
